Yes, it is. This is someone who CHOSE to use said dogwhistle as part of their twitter identity, so my best guess is that they were defiantly identifying themself as Jewish or a sympathiser to the Jewish cause.

A neonazi would not dogwhistle their own name. Logic therefore dictates that this person is not a neonazi. As further evidenced by their actual calling out of nazis and how they normalised violence against everyone else.

In this case, I think the content of the message is important and I did spend some time in consideration before reblogging.

This is not one of those instances where I didn’t know about it because of which device I was using. This is definitely someone who chose to label themselves in a manner identifying themself as Jewish to anyone who could perceive said dogwhistle.

I made a choice to pass along the information and hope that my conclusions were accurate. If I had the time, I would have done some research and added any factoids I found about the problematic part so I could put all minds at ease.

I do not now, nor ever will endorse racism, sexism, terfism, or swerfism. Exclusion based on prejudice is not my way. Education, awareness, the spreading of knowledge, and the sharing of puns is my way. 

When it comes to vital information, sometimes the contents are more important than the metaphorical wrapping paper. I made that call today.

If I could do it again, I would take the time to make certain.